Ernst & , Hartford, Kamienski, and Brehl consented to the SEC’s order without admitting or denying the findings. The firm agreed to pay $4.366 million in monetary sanctions for these violations, and Hartford and Brehl agreed to pay penalties of $25,000 each.

An Ernst & tax partner has alleged that she was “egregiously” sexually assaulted and harassed by a male colleague and was forced to alter her career after the accounting giant sought to

Wigdor LLP represents Jessica Casucci, a Partner at Ernst & (“EY”), in connection with her claims of sexual harassment, sexual assault and retaliation against EY, one of the largest accounting firms in the world.

Ernst & has been slapped with yet another lawsuit claiming that its offices are plagued with rampant sex harassment and discrimination against women.

Ernst & failed to adequately address her complaints about both the alleged sexual assault and other instances of harassment that she faced, forcing her to alter her career, while the alleged perpetrator faced few consequences, she said.

A partner at Ernst & has filed a complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, alleging harassment and retaliation at the professional services firm.

EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.

A female partner at Ernst & has agreed to leave the firm as part of a settlement over allegations that a male senior executive sexually assaulted and harassed her, The Post has learned

Accounting firm EY fosters a culture of misogyny and sexual harassment that keeps women from climbing the career ladder, according to a charge filed Sept. 24 with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Karen Ward, who was a partner at the firm formerly known as Ernst & LLP, says superiors responded to her bias complaints by transferring her to another group.

A spokesman for EY said that the individuals involved “violated multiple EY policies, hid their conduct and behaved in a way that was antithetical to EY’s global code of conduct, culture